Letter to the editor: it isn’t public security

This can be a letter to the editor-in-chief of Tompkins County resident Monique Caraballo in regards to the public security reform effort.. To submit Op-Eds, please overview our Letters Coverage right here and submit them to Anna Lamb at [email protected]

I’ve attended nearly each Reimagining Public Security discussion board, beginning with the very first one. I’ve seen firsthand town authorities interacting with its neighborhood and the police. Mayor Svante Myrick’s concept of ​​public security appears performative, calming and self-interested.

This course of is a efficiency from the beginning. Throughout public boards, contributors have been tone-controlled in discussion board discussions, didn’t have time to talk, and have been solely allowed to talk as soon as; there was no dialogue or dialogue. Questions in regards to the lack of sanction and the results of the Ithaca Police Division’s transgressions remained unanswered. They hear us, however do not hear. It isn’t public security.

Mayor Myrick advised us that eradicating police funding to the extent that the neighborhood demanded it was not a critical choice. He congratulates IPD and castigates the anti-racist demonstrators. It permits Brokers Slattery and Monticello to stay employed regardless of traumatic interactions with the general public. Its priorities clearly appear to give attention to sustaining the established order relatively than searching for restorative justice or accountability. It isn’t public security.

This course of was ostensibly a collaboration with the neighborhood. It is meant to be all of us, working collectively in order that the general public can assist inform and affect coverage relating to our safety and the officers who present it. The GQ article speaks of Mayor Myrick’s efforts, with solely fleeting recognition of the neighborhood he serves. The swiftly launched draft seems to replicate what Mayor Myrick desires and ignores the expressed wants of susceptible members of our neighborhood. It isn’t public security.

We want higher public providers. We want higher psychological well being providers, higher monetary assist, higher reasonably priced housing choices. Our present public providers are succesful, inaccessible and unable to sufficiently serve those that want them. For the reason that begin of the pandemic, the neighborhood has made self-help efforts to deal with these shortcomings. He has seen the undeserved hardships of too many underserved individuals. On this collaboration, the neighborhood does all of the work on these expressed wants.

Public security begins by rectifying these basic issues, listening to the cries of those that have been marginalized and are struggling to outlive. If this Public Safety challenge is the results of this collaboration, it’s sadly not imaginative. We needn’t rename police providers, we want remedial insurance policies.

Supply hyperlink

Previous Mutiny of Musical Clichés - The Hindu
Next Irish movies: what to observe on this Saint Patrick's Day